<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CPA and their PR puff, MFA and their tracking system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saudijeans.org/2010/07/28/cpa-and-their-pr-puff-mfa-and-their-tracking-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saudijeans.org/2010/07/28/cpa-and-their-pr-puff-mfa-and-their-tracking-system/</link>
	<description>Rants and Raves from Saudi Arabia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Andersson</title>
		<link>http://saudijeans.org/2010/07/28/cpa-and-their-pr-puff-mfa-and-their-tracking-system/#comment-22143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anders Andersson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saudijeans.org/?p=3514#comment-22143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it interesting that in the news article, the only CPA initiative mentioned is their campaign against &quot;counterfeit&quot; car parts. My guess is that once the consumers have accepted the notion that &quot;counterfeit&quot; equals &quot;risky&quot;, they won&#039;t object when customs authorities seizes a shipment of counterfeit jeans due to the very same piece of &lt;EM&gt;trademark&lt;/EM&gt; legislation.

So if the car is built from 100 percent &quot;authentic&quot; parts, it will never break or hurt anyone?

In Italy and France, it&#039;s even illegal to &lt;EM&gt;buy&lt;/EM&gt; counterfeit goods, at the insistence of the original trademark owners. Product safety is not even an issue. A Norwegian boy visiting Italy with his school class bought a cheap watch from a street vendor. He didn&#039;t care about the brand, but the police caught him, confiscated the watch, followed him to his hotel room to search his luggage, and also searched the luggage of his class mates travelling with the same bus. Oh, and he had to pay heavy fines as well.

Consumer protection? More like protecting the producers from non-loyal consumers...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that in the news article, the only CPA initiative mentioned is their campaign against &#8220;counterfeit&#8221; car parts. My guess is that once the consumers have accepted the notion that &#8220;counterfeit&#8221; equals &#8220;risky&#8221;, they won&#8217;t object when customs authorities seizes a shipment of counterfeit jeans due to the very same piece of <em>trademark</em> legislation.</p>
<p>So if the car is built from 100 percent &#8220;authentic&#8221; parts, it will never break or hurt anyone?</p>
<p>In Italy and France, it&#8217;s even illegal to <em>buy</em> counterfeit goods, at the insistence of the original trademark owners. Product safety is not even an issue. A Norwegian boy visiting Italy with his school class bought a cheap watch from a street vendor. He didn&#8217;t care about the brand, but the police caught him, confiscated the watch, followed him to his hotel room to search his luggage, and also searched the luggage of his class mates travelling with the same bus. Oh, and he had to pay heavy fines as well.</p>
<p>Consumer protection? More like protecting the producers from non-loyal consumers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

