Serouisly whats the point of not opening gun stores to sell low caliber weapons when you have scenes like this:

If the lack of women’s rights or any of those general notions in Saudi is a near-certain fact, then rebuttal evidence lies on the contenders to that fact.

I believe it is self-evident enough that the only case you could come up with to demonstrate justice in Saudi is unjust in itself.

Frankly, unless a commentator of the calibre of Andrew or Z Theory, or another regular is interested, I won’t bother turning them in here as being unnecessary to the discussion and easily found by those who can recognize a reliable site.

Fortunately, the dog didn’t eat my homework, and my computer didn’t either, so if one of those types of commentators or Ahmed wants the data I will be happy to turn in that part of my homework.

Rather painless, actually, except for the wince at your typo in your final coup de folie. It is always sad when someone’s signoff is marred by a typo, although we all do experience them, and so can empathize.

It doesn’t say: Jailed because the Islamic Court Judge decided to give it all to the wife! (the house and SR3,000 alimonies)

I guess, even in the Saudi Press there are biased morons on the enemy’s payroll: they will talk about this incident as breach of freedom of expression. Ah the freedom of expression! That makes imbecile tick! But they will NEVER mention that the woman got it all!

Where are the obnoxious loud mouth feminists always ready to point an accusatory finger at Islamic Courts and Scholars? At those Islamic Scholars and Judges! “Oh those Muslims men! All the same oppressors and misogynist! It’s Islam! It’s the men! It’s the backward Islamic Scholars out of the Middle Ages!”
Where are you loud mouths?!

Why don’t you mention oh! Ahmad those cases where women are treated well, with justice and dignity? Why do you always have to bring about anecdotal cases and subjects where the Kingdom, Saudis and Islam are depicted the way they are in the west?! They can claim ignorance. But YOU?! what is your excuse?

Be careful what you wish for! Your secret might soon be exposed and you bring ruin and shame to your whole family!

Yes it hurts! And it will hurt more if you don’t stop this whole arrogant rant about the Kingdom and Muslims!

This is false, and if you took the time to research it online, there is absolutely no irrefutable evidence supporting your statement. On the contrary.

And to answer Ahmad’s question:

the only good that could come out of this new law, is that some nut with a gun, could finally one day shut up all you aimless ignorant talking-heads that are dying for some attention!

LOL…told you! It hurst! … HAHAHAHAHA!

Things ought to be fair and reasonable, and often they are not. Which is farcical source of the unofficial byline of this very blog; We are young and we are not amused.

Your comments seem redolent of American debates on the issue for the USA.

Our situation is rather different.

Your comments incorporate the assumption that there are laws that are fixed and invariant.

In the context of our country, in which laws do not exist as they do in the USA, these Western axioms do not exist.

For example, the “Devils Advocate” comment presupposes that honest people follow laws.

Our society is rather different. Honesty and obedience to law are two unrelated concepts in our society — concepts that both overlap and diverge.

A very honest person in our society may or may not follow laws.